Sometimes You Have to Show Up
[While] regular work-at-home, among the non-self-employed population, [emphasis theirs] has grown by 115% since 2005 … [just] 3.7 million employees (2.8% of the workforce) now work from home at least half the time.
We concede that 2.8 percent of the workforce is at least quintuple the percentage of the population actually engaged in innovation or disruption (though the number of people talking about innovation and disruption has grown by 3,467,921.5% since 2005). But it still doesn’t constitute enough telecommuters to warrant all the rhetoric, does it?
And the concept of doing work at home has even spawned its own arcane breed of specialization and nuance. That’s right:
Telework is defined as the substitution of technology for travel, while telecommuting is more narrowly defined as the substitution of technology for commuter travel. Thus if someone takes work home after being at the office it is considered telework but not telecommuting, and if someone works at home instead of driving to an office they [sic] are telecommuting.
As you might imagine, a large percentage of the working population would like to work at home. And the explanation of that even comes with its own adjective — concentrative:
80% to 90% of the US workforce says they would like to telework at least part time. Two to three days a week seems to be the sweet spot that allows for a balance of concentrative work (at home) and collaborative work (at the office).
We imagine the most frustrated among the members of the US workforce must be those with no chance of teleworking, telecommuting, or teleanything, ever. And we imagine this to be a short but accurate lost of those frustrated folks:
- Surgeons (all types)
- House Painters
- Construction Workers
- Police Officers
- NASCAR Racers
We could probably have come up a with a few more. But you get the point: Telework and telecommuting are nice. But sometimes you just have to show up.
Nevertheless, if you don’t have dreams, all you have is nightmares.